#NOTION QUICK NOTE ARCHIVE#
#NOTION QUICK NOTE FULL#

There are still bugs / weird behaviors when switching rapidly between Bullet Points, Talking Points & Action Items, but it's livable. I'm told that they are moving to CommonMark (yay!). Sometimes you need a really well designed tool that brings all (or most) of the functionality under one roof.Дў) The writing surface is decent. In general I find that individuals can get away with Zapier and all sorts of APIs hacks to have The Perfect Setup, but those same setups tend to not scale well for organizations.

Fellow wraps all of this up quite nicely.

#NOTION QUICK NOTE FULL#

However, using two tools was a pain since often the Action Items in Todoist lacked context and we had to reference the note in Hugo to get the full picture. We had previously used Hugo for taking collaborative meeting notes, and it had integration with Todoist which seemed great at the time as we used Todoist to track back office AIs. I run a fitness group on Reddit with weekly check-ins, and I maintain a fairly popular training log written in Coda for coda folks have reached out to try to promote it somehow but I haven't had the time.ДЎ) Todo's / Action Items are integrated into note-taking app. In summary: yes, I'm trying to move towards 'one app for notes' as OP asked, but I have two categories of notes (private notes vs collaborative business notes), and each requires a different tool.Д¬oda is really great for a rapid app platform. Having meeting minutes and action items in one app has been transformative. Todoist AI's lacked context we had some janky automation to embed backlinks between Todoist AI's and their corresponding meeting minutes. We use Fellow for all of our non-engineering meetings (which use Atlassian products instead).ДЇinally, I know OP asked about notes and not Todo's / Action Items, but Fellow's handling AI's across teams has been better than Todoist's own business plan. The platform is great for our sales teams to capture notes during a call with a customer (sales CRMs like Pipedrive have this, but they do not make polished writing surfaces). Fellow's own website is targeted at manager-managee relationships (1-on-1 performance reviews, goal setting, etc). We recently switched to Fellow.app and are MUCH happier. Hugo had all the right goals, but bad execution. My team piloted Hugo.team for collaborative note-taking and sharing. Hosted solutions in the cloud make for janky writing surfaces IMO App speed and fluidity is important to me, which is one reason I haven't been able to stop using Bear. Worst case, I'll keep using Bear, but if there are gains to be had with a PKG then I am open to migrating. I'm diving into Roam now and holding out hope for Athens. I still use Coda as a low-code rapid app thingy (spreadsheets on steroids). Tried Notion & Coda and abandoned them both for notes / knowledge capture. I've used Bear for years and I still love it.

#NOTION QUICK NOTE ARCHIVE#

I have two needs: 1) a personal knowledge archive / second brain and 2) collaborative note-taking and sharing of meeting minutes with my colleagues An article in The Information recently did a review of note-taking apps( ), and my response there is similar to what I'll post here:

Notion quick note